1. Description of Premises.
2. Description of Project/Retail Center/Office Building.
1. Landlord’s objective.
a. Premises delivered “as is, where is”, subject to Landlord’s Work, if any.
b. No Landlord obligations regarding the condition of the project outside of the Premises.
2. Tenant’s objective.
a. Premises must be suitable for Tenant’s intended use.
b. Building systems serving the Premises must be in good working order.
c. Premises is delivered in compliance with applicable laws, including ADA.
d. Project sufficiently complete for conduct of Tenant’s business.
1. Landlord’s objectives.
One of Landlord’s principal motivations is to collect rent as soon as possible. Where Landlord is responsible for constructing the tenant improvements, Landlord can: (i) control the process, (ii) complete construction as soon as possible, and (iii) often earn a fee (which Landlord will argue is compensation for bearing the construction risk). Landlord’s goal in negotiating a build out provision is to:
a. Fix the rent commencement date on the date the improvements are substantially complete, notwithstanding the requirement to correct punch list items.
b. Include a definition of “Tenant Delay” to protect Landlord from delays in completing construction due to the failure of Tenant to timely perform.
c. Treat Tenant’s acceptance of the Premises as Tenant’s acknowledgment that the Premises are in good condition subject only to latent defects and punch list items, with a specific limitation on the period within which Tenant can ask that such latent defects and/or punch list items be corrected.
2. Tenant’s objectives.
Tenant wants high quality improvement at low costs. Tenant does not want to pay rent before the tenant improvements are completed. Tenant’s goal in negotiating a build out provision is to:
a. Establish specific standards for the quality of Landlord’s work.
b. Eliminate or limit Landlord’s fee for construction administration.
c. Require competitive bids from subcontractors in each trade.
d. Require that Landlord present Tenant with a detailed estimated cost breakdown. To the extent Landlord is providing a tenant improvement allowance with respect to only a portion of the tenant improvements (with Tenant paying all amounts in excess of the allowance), the cost breakdown should be reviewed to determine if any already completed improvements are included.
e. Define “Tenant Delay” narrowly. Tenant must be sure the construction schedule is realistic, and that Tenant is given advance notice of a potential Tenant Delay and a period to cure such potential delay. Further, Tenant should only allow Landlord to exercise its remedies to the extent a Tenant Delay actually causes a delay in construction.
f. Obtain the right to enforce warranties and guaranties directly.
3. Description of Improvements.
Ideally, final plans and specifications will be attached to the lease. If this isn’t possible, the parties should attach some description of the improvements and establish a procedure for approval.
4. Performance of Work.
(1) Greater construction expertise.
(2) Multi-tenant building.
(1) Minor work — control costs.
(2) Uniformity required for national chain.
c. Acceptance of work.
(1) “substantial completion” — minor punch list items which do not hinder tenant’s full use and operation of the premises.
(2) Punch list — preparation procedure.
(3) Effect of failure to specify a defect.
(1) “Pre-delivery” notice?
(2) Tenant remedy for late delivery — daily penalty fee or free rent/termination right if delay past drop dead date.
(3) Landlord remedy for tenant delay — accelerate obligation to pay rent one day for each day of tenant delay.
5. Payment Responsibility.
a. Typical improvement construction scenarios.
(1) Turnkey — Landlord constructs shell and all interior improvements required by tenant at Landlord’s sole cost.
(2) Landlord builds shell, building standard improvements and tenant improvements, with tenant receiving a construction allowance and reimbursing landlord for the difference, if any.
(3) Landlord builds shell and tenant, at its cost, constructs interior improvements.
(4) Tenant constructs building and interior improvements at tenant’s sole cost and expense (typical ground lease).
b. TI Allowance Reimbursement procedures.
(1) Lump sum payment or “construction” draws.
(2) Preconditions for disbursements.
(a) Issuance of certificate of occupancy.
(b) Receipt of all lien waivers.
(c) Architect’s certificate that work completed in accordance with plans and specifications.
(d) Tenant opened and paying rent.
1. Landlord’s delivery of Premises.
2. Landlord’s substantial completion of Landlord’s Work.
3. Tenant opens for business.
4. A specified number of days after Tenant obtains building permits.
1. Tie to Rent Commencement Date.
2. Extend expiration date to a convenient time of the year.
1. Building permit approval/sign permit approval.
2. Title review.
3. Environmental review.
Landlord practice pointer – Tenant termination rights should have a “use it or lose it” provision.
1. Exercise window – Landlord re-leasing time.
2. Void if Tenant defaults/assigns/subleases.
3. Rental rate.
a. Fixed at lease execution.
b. Greater of fair market rent or rent charged prior to exercise.
c. Discount for no transaction fees?
d. Arbitration – baseball vs. split the baby.
1. Landlord’s objective — Landlord only responsible for the presence of Hazardous Substances on the Premises prior to the date possession of the Premises is delivered to Tenant to extent remediation required by applicable laws.
2. Tenant’s objective.
a. Tenant only responsible for the presence of Hazardous Substances on the Premises as a result of an act of Tenant.
b. Remedies, including abatement of rent and termination rights, for closure due to Hazardous Substance not caused by Tenant.
Landlord wants to be able to control who occupies the Project and for what uses. Occupants must be creditworthy, not adversely affect the reputation of the building, not increase Landlord’s ownership risks or adversely affect other tenants of the building or project.
Tenant’s obligations will continue even though Tenant’s circumstances change, such as the death of an individual, a downturn in Tenant’s business, a change in the retail tenant’s concept or a merger or consolidation of a corporate tenant resulting in the space becoming unnecessary. Tenant wants the flexibility to find other users to occupy all or a portion of the space and assume some or all of Tenant’s remaining obligations under the lease. In addition, the other provisions of the lease (such as the lease’s use clause and its restrictions on alterations) must be flexible.
E. Circumstances in which it is reasonable for the landlord to withhold the landlord’s consent.
1. The transferee’s financial condition is inadequate.
2. The transferee’s proposed use is different than the tenant’s use.
3. The nature of the proposed use may result in: (i) an increase in insurance premiums, (ii) an increased risk with respect to the use or release of hazardous materials in the building or project, (iii) increased likelihood of damage or destruction, (iv) increased density or pedestrian traffic through the building or project, or (v) the installation of new tenant improvements which are incompatible with existing building system components.
4. The expected percentage rent for the transferee’s business is less than that of Tenant.
5. The transferee is a labor union, foreign or domestic governmental entity, public utility or tax-exempt organization.
6. The transferee is an existing occupant of the building or project, or a person or entity Landlord has dealt with previously with respect to leasing space in the building or project.
7. In the case of a sublease, the monthly rental and other economic concessions result in the effective rent being less than the monthly rent Landlord is asking for similar space in the building or project.
8. In the case of a sublease, the proposed subletting would result in more than a specified number of subleases of portions of the premises being in effect at any one time or more than a specified number of subleases during the term of the lease.
1. Landlord’s perspective — Because of the importance of controlling the Project, Landlord will often include a “recapture” clause in the lease. If Tenant seeks Landlord’s consent to an assignment or sublease under a recapture clause, Landlord has the option to “recapture” the space, terminating the lease. By recapturing the space, Landlord will release Tenant from any further liability under the lease. Landlord will presumably exercise this option (and forego having Tenant remain liable on the lease) if Landlord wants control of the space or if Landlord can relet the space at a higher rent.
2. Tenant’s perspective — Tenant is in a difficult position of having to market the space subject to Landlord’s ability to kill the deal at the last minute. Tenant can minimize this problem by requiring Landlord to decide whether to exercise Landlord’s recapture option earlier in the process.
a. Lease to have a clear (and short) time period within which Landlord must exercise its recapture option.
b. Ability of Tenant to withdraw its request to assign or sublet if Landlord notifies Tenant that Landlord intends to terminate the lease.
c. In the case of a proposed sublease, Landlord’s recapture right only applies to the sublet space and the lease will be amended to reflect the reduced size of the leased premises, with the rental rate and Tenant’s share of taxes and insurance adjusted accordingly.
1. Transfers by an individual tenant to an entity controlled by tenant.
2. Transfers by Tenant to an affiliated entity.
3. Transfers by way of merger, consolidation or the acquisition of assets or capital stock (however, if the lease is a retail lease, landlord will want to condition the approval of such transfer on, among other things, the proposed transferee having sufficient retail experience and there being no change in the use of the Premises).
1. A “bonus” rent clause entitles Landlord to receive some or all of the rent or other consideration payable by a transferee as a result of the lease transfer to the extent the new rent exceeds the existing rent.
2. This additional rent may be in the form of a lump sum payment in the case of a lease assignment or higher subrent in the case of a sublease.
3. Landlord will justify their “right” to bonus rent on the theory that Landlord, not Tenant, is in the real estate business, and only Landlord is entitled to increases in rents due to increases in the value of the real estate.
4. Tenant will want deducted from bonus rent all of Tenant’s leasing costs.
Where Tenant assigns its interest in the lease, Tenant will remain liable for all of the obligations of the lessee under the lease unless Landlord specifically releases Tenant from Tenant’s obligations under the lease.